Family and Matrimonial Computer Examinations

More enquiries are turned away from this page than from any other on the site, and the reason is always the same one. Whose device is it. Answer that first and the rest of the conversation is short: a machine that is yours, or that the two of you bought between you, or that a solicitor or a judge has named, can be examined properly and often to good effect. A machine that belongs to your husband or wife alone cannot, at any price.

Whose device is it? That question comes first. £800 + VAT examined and written up, £400 + VAT for the verified image with its deleted material extracted — the same figure an encrypted drive carries. Diagnosis is free and the scope is written down. Forensic work is one of the four exclusions from no fix, no fee. No phones, no tablets. Prices.

Three questions before a device is booked in

The first is ownership. Yours, jointly yours, or named in a written instruction or a direction — and if none of those apply the conversation ends there rather than at the invoice. The second is whether proceedings are on foot and whether the court's permission for expert evidence has been dealt with, because in family cases that permission is not a formality. The third is what is actually in issue: a date, a document, a figure behind a figure. All three get asked on the telephone, before anything is packed, and answering them takes about ten minutes. It is a good deal cheaper than discovering the problem after a custody file has been opened.

Helping yourself to the other side's material backfires

The temptation in a bitter case is obvious, and it is a trap. Using a password you happen to know, or working one out, to open somebody else's machine is unauthorised access under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. Beyond that exposure, the courts have been firm that self-help is not a route to disclosure: material taken that way can end up having to be handed back, sometimes unread, and the taking becomes a separate argument running alongside the one you came in with. The practical effect is worse than the legal one. A judge who has spent an afternoon on how you obtained a document has spent no time at all on what the document says.

Two refusals, printed here rather than buried in the terms

The first is handsets. Phones and tablets are not examined at this laboratory, for anybody, in any kind of matter — and since asking about a mobile is one of the commonest reasons anyone rings a forensic practice at all, it is stated on the page rather than discovered on the telephone. Where a case genuinely turns on what is inside a handset, that work belongs to a different laboratory and probably behind a disclosure application first. The second refusal is monitoring software: not sold here, not installed here, not recommended here, in any circumstances anybody has yet put forward. What this page offers looks backwards at material that already exists, on hardware you are entitled to have examined — which is the only sort of evidence a family court has ever thanked anybody for producing.

What can be established on the right device

Rather a lot, and it is worth knowing before deciding whether the exercise is proportionate. Correspondence, statements and spreadsheets that were removed can often be brought back out of unallocated space or out of shadow copies. Each recovered item carries file clocks that fix it to a day. The working material sitting behind a disclosed figure is frequently still there: the earlier version of the spreadsheet, the export it was built from, the message it arrived attached to. Sign-in and browsing activity can be confined to the weeks that matter. And where a cleaning tool has been run, that generally shows, with the hour and the account behind it.

A narrow question answered firmly beats a wide one answered vaguely

Nobody benefits from an unrestricted read of a household computer, least of all the person paying for it. So the scope is settled at the outset — one device, one date range, defined categories, agreed search terms — and that keeps both the cost and the report pointed at what the court has to decide. It also keeps out material that belongs to other people, including children, and material that is privileged, which is isolated and sent back to the solicitors rather than read here. Under a joint instruction the same scope is shown to both sides before any work begins and the findings reach both of them at the same time.

The method and the custody standards sit on the forensic practice hub. A device that has to be copied before somebody sells it or resets it is legal hold and chain of custody; the capture itself is workstation deep imaging; and putting an hour on a removal is deleted-file forensics.

// when this work can lawfully be done

The devices an examiner may look at

Six situations where the ownership question has an answer. If yours is not among them, ring anyway and we will say so before you have spent anything.

A laptop of your own that has had letters or files taken off it
The family desktop, or a drive the pair of you paid for together
Equipment your solicitor wants captured before it is sold or reset
A device already named in a direction the court has made
A machine belonging to a family company, on that company's authority
A single joint expert appointment both firms of solicitors have signed up to
// what comes back, and off which device

The output of a family instruction

Every item below comes off an image of a device the ownership question has an answer for. Nothing below is produced from any other sort of device, whatever anybody is prepared to pay.

Recovered documents

Letters, statements and spreadsheets returned wherever enough of them survived.

A day against each

File clocks used to place every recovered item on a particular date.

Behind a disclosed figure

The earlier draft, the export it came from, the message that carried it.

Only the weeks in issue

Sign-in and browsing activity limited to the period actually in dispute.

Scope, settled first

Device, dates, categories and search terms, written down before work starts.

Handling that holds

Hashes, seals and signatures, so the argument stays about the evidence.

// the fee, and who may lawfully ask for it

What it costs, and the authority it stands on

What it costs, said plainly and early

A written report on one machine and one question is £800 + VAT. The image on its own, verified, with the deleted material extracted and nothing interpreted, is £400 + VAT — which many solicitors prefer, because it lets them read the material themselves and decide whether a report is worth commissioning. That £400 is the same figure an encrypted drive or a CCTV recorder disk attracts on the ordinary list rather than a special rate for family work, and this site has five bands and no sixth.

£800 + VATOne device, one question, examined and written up, with the range of opinion given wherever the material honestly supports more than one reading.
£400 + VATThe verified image and its extracted material, for a solicitor to work through. No findings, no opinion, no report.

Both are settled before any work begins, because forensic instructions are one of the four published exclusions from no fix, no fee, alongside electronic and mechanical failure, chip-level work and DVR jobs. In a family matter that cuts both ways and is meant to: an examination that finds nothing cost the same afternoon as one that finds a great deal. Anything covering more than a single device is measured during the free diagnostic and priced in writing beforehand. The diagnostic costs nothing and closes two working days after the device is booked in at Oxford, which is the moment the custody file opens on it.

Ownership and permission, settled on the telephone

Family instructions turn on two things and both are dealt with before a device is booked in. Ownership first: the machine is yours outright, or the two of you own it between you, or a solicitor or a judge has named it in writing. Those are the same three routes every instruction on this site has to arrive by — issued company equipment, a written instruction, or the client's own property. Permission second, since expert evidence in family proceedings is not admitted as a matter of course. A device belonging to your husband or wife alone fits none of that and no fee changes it: working out or guessing somebody else's password is unauthorised access under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. Monitoring software is not sold, fitted or recommended here for anybody. Live traffic is not intercepted, that power belonging under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 to bodies a laboratory is not among. And phones and tablets are not examined at all, which on this page is the refusal that disappoints the most callers.

// family instructions — the calls we take

The five questions that come up every week

No, for two reasons that each work on their own. Mobiles and tablets are not examined at this laboratory in any kind of case. And a device belonging solely to the other party is not something you can lawfully instruct anybody to examine. Where a handset genuinely matters, the route is an application for disclosure, made by your solicitor, and it is a better route in any event because whatever comes out of it arrives with the court's blessing.
No. Nothing of that kind is sold, fitted or recommended here. Putting monitoring software on a device somebody else owns is unlawful, and in practice it also converts a case about money or children into a case about your conduct, which is not a trade anybody should want to make. The work offered on this page is retrospective: it reads what is already sitting on hardware you are entitled to have examined.
It settles the ownership question and leaves the scope question open. A jointly owned machine can be examined on your instruction, but it will hold material belonging to other people and possibly correspondence with lawyers, so the sensible course is to agree in advance which dates, which categories and which search terms are in play. If the other side is represented, a joint instruction is the version least likely to turn into a fight about the evidence.
That is the judge's decision on the day, and two things feed into it: whether expert evidence was permitted, and whether the material was obtained lawfully. Both are matters for your solicitor rather than for a laboratory. What is within our control is the handling — a write-blocked acquisition, an E01 verified on SHA-256, notes made as the work happened, a complete custody file, and a report that gives the range of opinion where the evidence allows more than one.
£800 + VAT covers one device and one question, examined and written up in full. Take the report away and you are left with £400 + VAT: the verified image with its deleted material extracted, which a good many solicitors prefer because it lets them read the material and then decide whether a report earns its keep. That £400 is not a family-work rate — it is the figure an encrypted drive or a CCTV recorder disk already attracts on the ordinary list. Diagnosis is free and finishes two working days after the device is booked in at Oxford. Anything covering more than one device is quoted in writing first, and investigations are among the four published exclusions from no fix, no fee, so the money is agreed before rather than after.
// getting your media to Oxford

Posting a device in — what goes in the box

Nothing gets packed until the ownership question has been answered, so make the call to 0800 689 0668 first, or ask your solicitor to make it. There is no collection service anywhere in this network and no counter in Coventry. The drive travels to Oxford tracked and insured, or across the counter there during office hours, and it enters the custody file as it is booked in.

As a rule the storage comes out and the machine stays where it is. That applies to a laptop, a tower, an iMac and to the recorder sitting under a counter. Taking equipment apart is not something this bench does, and a repair shop will free a drive in a few minutes. Two things go the other way: an external drive stays sealed inside its own case, and a NAS travels as a complete unit with its disks still in their bays. A Fusion Mac is a third case — both of its drives come out and travel together, each one labelled. The single situation nobody can work around is memory soldered flat onto a mainboard, which is how Apple Silicon Macs and a good many slim laptops are built: if the storage will not unbolt, there is no parcel to send.

  • Use a box or padded mailer with some rigidity to it, and pack around the drive until nothing shifts when the parcel is tilted. Mains adaptors, docks and leads are not wanted at this end.
  • Sending a RAID or a server? Only the member disks travel — not the chassis, not the controller — and each one wants its bay number written on it. Take a photograph of the front of the unit before anything is pulled; it costs nothing and now and again it saves a day.
  • Print the shipping and booking-in form (PDF), add a name, a number you will answer and a sentence on how the trouble began, and drop it in beside the media.
  • Most people use Special Delivery, which is tracked and covered; a courier of your own does the same job. You can also bring it: the Oxford reception takes devices over the counter, Mon–Fri 9:00am–5:30pm. Neither a Coventry counter nor a collection round exists.
// write this on the label

Oxford Data Recovery

John Eccles House
Oxford Science Park
Robert Robinson Avenue
Littlemore, Oxford, OX4 4GP

↓ Print the shipping & booking-in form (PDF)

Put Oxford Data Recovery on the label. From Coventry it is roughly fifty-five miles straight down the M40, about an hour if you would rather drive it in than post it. Either way you are told the moment it is logged, and the free diagnostic finishes two working days later.

Unsure what ought to go in the box? Ring 0800 689 0668 before you seal it, or work through the free online diagnostic and let it do the asking.

One question decides it. Whose machine is it?

Put that to us on the telephone, or have your solicitor do it, and you will know inside ten minutes whether there is a job here at all.